Demand-first self-help guide

Still Getting Marketing Texts After Replying STOP?

What to preserve when a recognizable sender continues marketing texts after an opt-out request, and when not to reply.

Short answer

What matters most

A clear opt-out request and later marketing messages from the same identifiable sender can be important evidence. Preserve the entire chronology, because the exact wording, sender identity, timing, confirmation message, later contacts, consent history, and exceptions can affect the analysis.

Manual process

What to do

  1. Decide whether replying is safe

    For a recognizable company or program you joined, follow the stated opt-out method. For an obvious phishing or wrong-number scam, replying may merely confirm that your number is active; report and block it instead.

  2. Capture the opt-out

    Save the full thread showing your STOP or other unambiguous request, its timestamp, and any automated confirmation.

  3. Document later messages

    Record every later marketing text without deleting the earlier context. Distinguish a final opt-out confirmation from a new solicitation.

  4. Confirm whether it is the same sender

    Compare the brand, campaign, URL, offer, callback number, short code, and destination—not only the displayed sending number.

  5. Request resolution

    When a reachable business is identifiable, send an evidence-backed demand describing the opt-out and later contacts before considering filing.

Important limits

Do not skip these cautions

  • A STOP reply is not a universal requirement for every possible claim, and it does not make every later message unlawful.
  • Do not click suspicious links to identify a sender or unsubscribe from an apparent scam.

Primary and reported sources

Verify the rules and examples

Demand first

Return to the complete process

See how this step fits into evidence preservation, business identification, a documented resolution demand, negotiation, and filing only as a final escalation.

Open the complete guide